QIM Takes A Hit In March, First Quarter

Apr 7 2010 | 11:22am ET

Quantitative Investment Management has not started the new decade off on the right foot.

Three of the firm’s four hedge funds finished the first quarter of 2010 in negative territory. Its flagship Quantitative Global Program, with $4.6 billion in assets, is down 5.74% after shedding 1.02% in March. Its Quantitative Global Fund 1x is a little further down, with a 5.81% drop in the beginning of 2010 following a 1.06% loss in March.

Unsurprisingly, its three-times levered version of the latter fund is really down in the dumps. The $348 million fund fell 3.07% in March and is down 16.76% on the year.

The funds’ interest rates investments took the biggest hit in March, accounting for nearly three-quarters of the decline. Grains and soft commodities also hurt the funds.

But, according to QIM, the bad news is actually good news.

“On March 12, the Global Program reached a 10% decline from its September peak, triggering a third reduction in risk which brought our exposure to 25% of its normal level,” QIM wrote to investors. “This is the second time in our track record that the 10% drawdown level has been hit. Despite the last severe drawdown, which occurred in March 2004, the Global Program still managed to return over 23% that year.”

The first quarter was not all bad for QIM: The firm’s two-year old, $482 million Quantitative Tactical Aggressive Fund rose 1.09% in March, and is up 4.95% on the year.


In Depth

AIMA: Smaller Firms Remain the Lifeblood of the Hedge Fund Industry

Jul 26 2017 | 5:55pm ET

It is a hedge fund industry truism that the largest managers receive the most attention...

Lifestyle

CFA Institute To Add Computer Science To Exam Curriculum

May 24 2017 | 9:25pm ET

Starting in 2019, financial industry executives sitting for the coveted Chartered...

Guest Contributor

Rastegar: PE Real Estate Gains Momentum as Uncertainty Rises

Jul 21 2017 | 6:04pm ET

The steady march of equity markets and fundamental shift in the direction of Fed...

 

From the current issue of