Petters Gets 50 Years For $3.65 Billion Ponzi Scheme

Apr 8 2010 | 11:30am ET

Ponzi schemer Thomas Petters was sentenced to 50 years in prison this morning for defrauding investors of $3.65 billion.

U.S. District Judge Richard Kyle imposed the sentenced in St. Paul, Minn., federal court, four months after the 52-year-old was convicted of 20 counts of fraud, conspiracy and money laundering.

Prosecutors had sought 335 years for Petters, noting that “there are only a handful of fraud schemes that are even comparable in the history of the United States.” Petters’ own lawyers suggested four-to-12 years would be more appropriate.

Petters has vowed to appeal his conviction, claiming the fraud was orchestrated by his underlings without his knowledge.

Petter’s fraud, which came to light just months before the much larger Bernard Madoff scam collapsed, involved selling bogus notes linked to consumer electronics sales which prosecutors say never actually happened. Investors in Petters Co. were told they were buying bulk electronics which were being resold to big-box retailers.

At least 20 hedge funds were the chief victims of the scheme, according to the complaint, and at least one allegedly helped Petters cover up his scam. In October, Lancelot Investment Management founder Gregory Bell pleaded guilty to mail fraud, admitting he co-engineered a series of bogus “roundtrip” transactions with Petters designed to hide losses and keep the Ponzi scheme afloat.


In Depth

Q&A: Reg A+ Will Transform the Alternative Asset Landscape

Jul 7 2015 | 4:03pm ET

In addition to easing capital formation for small companies, Regulation A+ has enormous...

Lifestyle

Fiat Chrysler Files Paperwork For Ferrari IPO

Jul 23 2015 | 5:05pm ET

Italian sportscar maker Ferrari has taken a step closer to a stock market listing...

Guest Contributor

Lifting of Foreign Ownership Limits Signals Sea Change in Vietnam's Capital Markets

Jul 28 2015 | 3:01pm ET

The lifting of restrictions on foreign ownership limits in Vietnam later this year...

 

Editor's Note