Blackstone Fights Proposed Curb On Placement Agents In Calif.

Apr 9 2010 | 1:23am ET

The Blackstone Group is putting its considerable weight behind an effort to ban alternative investment firms from paying contingency fees to placement agents.

The New York-based private equity giant, which owns its own placement agency, the Park Hill Group, has hired a California lobbying firm as part of its bid to see the bill defeated in the California Legislature. Despite the recent pay-to-play scandal at New York’s main public pension fund, Blackstone says that placement agents, which typically get between 0.5% and 3% of the mandates they win for clients, are getting a bad rap.

“It’s just like the state of California looking to sell bonds,” Blackstone spokesman Peter Rose told Bloomberg News. “They would hire a middleman”—a municipal bond underwriter—“to market those bonds to whoever buys bonds.”

But California’s treasurer and the country’s largest public pension fund, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, which proposed the bill, disagree.

“The contingency fees are too much of a jackpot for placement agents” and “invite corrupt practices,” California Treasurer Bill Lockyer told Bloomberg.

And Lockyer warns that Blackstone and other placement agents should be careful of what they wish for. If the current bill fails—it requires a two-thirds majority vote by the Legislature—he said he will propose a bill to ban placement agents from both CalPERS and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, the second-biggest public pension fund in the U.S.


In Depth

MiFID2 For U.S. Firms: Key Questions Answered

Feb 27 2017 | 4:54pm ET

The January 2018 deadline for implementation of the EU’s mammoth MiFID2 regulations...

Lifestyle

'Tis the Season: Wall Street Holiday Parties Back In Fashion

Dec 22 2016 | 9:23pm ET

Spending on Wall Street holiday parties has largely returned to pre-2008 levels...

Guest Contributor

iCapital Network: The Trump Effect On Direct Lending

Feb 23 2017 | 4:21pm ET

The arrival of the Trump Administration has raised questions among private debt...

 

From the current issue of