Wednesday, 22 October 2014
Last updated 7 hours ago
Jul 30 2010 | 9:00am ET
By Thomas Kuntz, Polymetis LLC -- Since the publication of Harry Markowitz’s seminal “Portfolio Selection” in the Journal of Finance in 1952, the genesis of modern portfolio theory (“MPT”), the application of statistical and quantitative methods to asset management, has increased dramatically. That growth has been enhanced in the past few decades by the exponential growth of computing power, the convenience of user-friendly software, the accessibility of vast amounts of data, and the proliferation of innovative and functional research.
This has been a positive net development, but it has not come without certain costs, particularly for the existing or potential hedge fund investor. The explosion in the availability of facts and figures, however, has not necessarily led to a commensurate increase in useful information. If anything, there may be too much data to process efficiently, and too many ways to slice and dice them. Statistics are neither informative nor useful just because they can be calculated. Furthermore, chasing after every possible measure consumes investors’ most valuable resources, time and attention, and can lead to paralysis from analysis.
One useful tactic to combat this potential data and analytical overload is to, every now and again, refocus on the core quantitative elements embedded in the manager evaluation and portfolio construction process. It is useful, therefore, to focus on the “big three” of asset management statistics: mean, standard deviation, and correlation coefficient. Why these three? Not only are they the most widely-used and accepted investment statistics, but according to MPT, one can design efficient portfolios of assets using only these inputs.
Let us re-examine these three key measures with a fresh perspective, and with a minimum of mathematical theory, to see what they can tell us.
Statistics are like power tools, very helpful and effective when used properly, and potentially dangerous and destructive when used improperly. It makes sense to handle them with care since we have learned the following:
So, other than being aware of these limitations and taking care not to rely too heavily on these statistics, what should the intrepid hedge fund investor do? There are a variety of other measures to consider, though there are no easy or complete solutions.
There is no one size fits all solution. In the end, the use of statistical analyses in hedge fund evaluation and portfolio construction is a process that must be managed carefully. Ultimately, the best defense is a well-constructed, comprehensive program implemented by experienced and knowledgeable practitioners.
The full white paper can be found here: The Statistical Mystique
Thomas Kuntz is chief executive officer of Polymetis LLC, an investment boutique founded in 2009 to provide premier due diligence, research, and investment advisory services in the alternative marketplace.
Sep 22 2014 | 4:15pm ET
"I tell people that everybody likes good news and so if you have good performance that’s wonderful,” explains Mike McKitish of Peddie School's endowment, “but it’s the people that want to talk about the bad news or where they drifted and how they came back and how they stayed to their discipline…” that he wants to hear from. Read more…
Most traders agree that proper risk management is the key to successful trading. However, many traders depend on the deeply flawed measure of standard deviation as a benchmark of risk. Here we put it ...