SEC Watchdog: No Politics In Goldman Case

Oct 18 2010 | 9:43am ET

The Securities and Exchange Commission's fraud lawsuit against Goldman Sachs was not motivated by a desire to boost President Barack Obama's then-faltering drive to push through financial regulation reform, the agency's inspector general has found.

The only politics in the announcement and timing of the suit came from a desire not to anger New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, who announced a settlement of charges against private equity firm Quadrangle Group the day after the SEC voted to sue Goldman for misleading investors in a collateralized debt obligation allegedly structured and marketed on behalf of hedge fund Paulson & Co.

"I was a little worried that the attorney general would be very upset if we announced multiple cases the same day," SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro testified in H. David Kotz's investigation.

The regulator's investigation of Goldman was frequently delayed, and the SEC said it was concerned about leaks, Congressional hearings and "maximizing and shaping positive press coverage."

On the latter point, things appear to have gone far better than the agency could ever have hoped.

"Many SEC witnesses in this investigation, including Chairman Schapiro, testified that they were surprised or shocked at the extent of the media attention given to the Goldman action," Kotz wrote. "This belief held by the SEC staff, which is corroborated by e-mails, that the Goldman action might not have significant public impact, much less the impact that it ultimately had, is another factor that argues against the idea that the SEC or its staff were attempting to influence financial regulatory reform legislation."

Kotz also found that the frequent delays in bringing the case had nothing to do with politics.

The SEC first planned a vote by its commissioners for December, but delayed it to give the investigation more time. It then scheduled a Jan. 28 vote—motivated by an impending Senate hearing on Goldman—but delayed it again over a series of issues, including concerns by one commissioner, questions about whether to accuse an "additional individual" in the case and a desire to give the probe yet more time.

The SEC finally voted—along party lines—on April 14 to bring the suit. Goldman eventually settled the case for $550 million.


In Depth

Exotic Assets: Investing In Rare Violins

Jan 17 2017 | 4:43pm ET

By definition, alternative investments include exotic assets far beyond your typical...

Lifestyle

'Tis the Season: Wall Street Holiday Parties Back In Fashion

Dec 22 2016 | 9:23pm ET

Spending on Wall Street holiday parties has largely returned to pre-2008 levels...

Guest Contributor

The Trump Administration: What It Could Mean for Carried Interest

Jan 19 2017 | 5:25pm ET

The arrival of the Trump administration brings the potential for a repeal of the...

 

From the current issue of

Often seen as a passion project, or part of a philanthropic venture, rare and fine stringed instruments offer an exciting option to diversify one’s investment portfolio while providing an opportunity for an exceptional long-term investment.