Did Greenlight’s Einhorn Reject Buffett?

Oct 28 2010 | 4:12am ET

Soon-to-be-former hedge fund manager Todd Combs may have been Warren Buffett’s third choice as one of his potential successors. Was David Einhorn the first?

The Wall Street blog Insider Monkey certainly thinks so. And it also thinks it knows why Einhorn turned down the opportunity to take over for the legendary Oracle of Omaha at Berkshire Hathaway: money.

Einhorn, who runs Greenlight Management, earns some $200 million a year, according to Insider Monkey. Buffett himself earns a $500,000 annual salary. The blog concludes, “David Einhorn is simply too expensive for Warren Buffett.”

But why Einhorn in the first place? Insider Monkey offers three good reasons and two, um, less good reasons. The blog cites his value investing and reinsurance backgrounds, as well as, of course, Greenlight’s impressive returns. Insider Monkey notes that the hedge fund has returned an annualized 22% after the fees that Buffett has frequently derided.

The other reasons? Einhorn is the same age as Combs, 42, and is a Midwesterner.


In Depth

'Smart Beta' Funds In Regulators' Sights, Hedgies May Be Next

Mar 26 2015 | 11:11am ET

Funds that mimic strategies used by active managers for a fraction of the cost could...

Lifestyle

Study: Both Marriage and Divorce Lead to Negative Hedge Fund Performance

Mar 25 2015 | 6:51pm ET

Trouble at home leads to trouble in the market for fund managers, according to researchers...

Guest Contributor

Concerned About Your HFT Exposure? Hedge It!

Mar 26 2015 | 1:06pm ET

High-frequency trading has been a persistent storyline for several years. The trading...

 

Sponsored Content

    Mar 9 2015 | 6:35am ET

    Kelly RodriquesKelly RodriquesAs more investors look to diversify, many are beginning to use retirement funds to invest in alternative assets such as private equity and real estate. Kelly Rodriques, CEO & President of PENSCO Trust Company, explains how companies can connect with those looking to use their retirement accounts in a different way. Read more…

Editor's Note