Itchy Trigger Finger Costs Jabre Dearly During Japan Crisis

Mar 29 2011 | 1:16pm ET

Most of the hedge fund managers who took big losses earlier this month can blame the huge earthquake and tsunami in Japan. Philippe Jabre can only blame himself.

Jabre, who had been looking for a decline in Japanese stock prices to jump into the market, eliminated his hedges on the country's stock market the day the disaster struck, taking Jabre Capital Partners' Global Balanced Fund's exposure to Japan from 9% to 15%, The Wall Street Journal reports. But there was another unforeseen disaster on the horizon: the resulting nuclear crisis in northern Japan.

Bad news from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant sent Japanese stocks tumbling further, and with them Jabre's funds, one of which was down as much as 10%. That number is something of limit for Jabre, who also ditched the U.S. stock market after losses totaling 10% in 2008.

"If we touch negative 10%, we get very, very, very nervous," Jabre, a former star trader at GLG Partners said.

So, on March 16, Jabre gave another fateful order: Sell everything. JabCap sold off all of its stocks, leaving it with a US$300 million loss.

Jabre reasoned, "If we're wrong, we set the firm back. But we'll be alive to fight another day."

He was wrong. While other hedge funds have seen their losses cut by a rally in Japanese markets, JabCap is stuck with its, and Jabre again can only blame himself.

Which is not to say that he would do otherwise: "This is the firm's style; even if there's just a one-in-six chance of a nuclear explosion, we couldn't take the risk."

"We couldn't take the risk of the Tokyo Stock Exchange closing down, so we sold."

Jabre said he consulted with four nuclear scientists as the crisis unfolded, but explained, "It's the first time a nuclear meltdown was at risk. It was hard to assess the consequences."

For JabCap's flagship Global fund, the consequences are clear: a 7% loss in March and a 3% year-to-date loss. Jabre has been in touch with his investors, trying to explain the mess.

"The reason we're still around is our risk management," he said. "We're telling clients that we've lost six months of performance, but we'll be back."


In Depth

GSAM's Papagiannis: Liquid Alternatives For The Long Run

Apr 21 2017 | 8:44pm ET

Interest in liquid alternatives cooled a bit last year amid a broad shift in investor...

Lifestyle

Aston Martin Returns To Debt Market As DB11 Drives Turnaround

Mar 31 2017 | 5:21pm ET

James Bond’s preferred carmaker is returning to the public debt markets for the...

Guest Contributor

Debunking Conventional Investment Wisdom (Part II)

Apr 17 2017 | 5:56pm ET

The alternative investment industry is currently replete with buzzwords around data...

 

From the current issue of