Study: Hedge Funds That Launch Big Often Underperform

Jun 30 2011 | 8:11am ET

Starting out big doesn’t necessarily guarantee success in the hedge fund world, according to a study of Asian (excluding Australia and Japan) fund launches by hedge fund consultant GFIA.

GFIA looked at 510 fund launches between 2000 and 2010 and found that “large” funds—those that launched with over $75 million AUM—consistently underperformed their peers in all subsequent years.

Said Peter Douglas, principal of GFIA: “For experienced allocators these are intuitive findings. Nobody is surprised to learn that large funds experience a ‘snowball’ effect, raising assets quickly—nor that large fund launches are a reliable predictor of underperformance. What’s surprising is that investors continue to back larger funds, knowing they’re likely to underperform.”

GFIA’s study found that funds launched with AUM of less than $5 million showed little predictability of performance relative to their peers while funds launching with AUM between $10 million and $25 million tend to show the most consistent performance.

The study also found that funds that close down do so, on average, in 2.5 to 4 years for most strategies.


In Depth

Royalties: The Alternative Assets of the Music Industry

Jul 8 2016 | 7:01pm ET

Recent market volatility has investors seeking greater insight into alternative...

Lifestyle

Moore Capital PM Fired After Raucous Hamptons Party

Jul 7 2016 | 10:47pm ET

A portfolio manager for Louis Bacon’s $15 billion hedge fund Moore Capital Management...

Guest Contributor

MPI: Like Stellar Returns? Better Understand the Risks First

Jul 22 2016 | 8:44pm ET

When the press reports extraordinarily strong relative or risk-adjusted returns...