Bulldog Seeks Rehearing Of First Amendment Case

Oct 10 2011 | 12:03pm ET

It's no accident that Philip Goldstein named his hedge fund Bulldog Investors: The man is not one to give up when he thinks he's right.

Goldstein has asked Massachusetts' highest court to reconsider its ruling last month that Bulldog's free speech rights were violated when the state's Securities Division fined it for providing information to a non-accredited investor.

In its petition for a rehearing, Bulldog argues that it never made an offering when it offered information on its Web site and via e-mail. Given that "no illegal transaction is being promoted," the New Jersey-based hedge fund argues that "it is undeniable that these rules, on their face and as applied, prohibit the non-rich from reading the same non-misleading information about unregistered securities that the rich can read."

"The court's erroneous ruling is evidenced by its flawed reasoning, but the apparent and more fundamental cause of the court's error is its unwillingness to enforce First Amendment principles as rigorously when the offending law is a federal and a Massachusetts securities regulation as it does when the challenged law does not regulate securities," Andrew Good, Bulldog's lawyer, wrote.

Bulldog ran into trouble four years ago when it e-mailed information to a non-accredited investor. The hedge fund was slapped with a  cease-and-desist order and ordered to pay a $25,000 fine.


In Depth

FINalternatives Survey: We Asked Investment Pros...

Apr 2 2016 | 9:42pm ET

The data from our annual reader survey continues to roll in and provide interesting...

Lifestyle

Point72's Cohen Donates $275M To Veterans Mental Health Network

Apr 6 2016 | 8:31pm ET

Billionaire hedge fund manager Steve Cohen has formed a non-profit aimed at treating...

Guest Contributor

Agecroft: Why NYCERS Should Reconsider Exiting All Hedge Funds

Apr 18 2016 | 5:51pm ET

The recent decision by the New York City Employment Retirement System to exit its...