Tuesday, 21 October 2014
Last updated 11 hours ago
Dec 14 2011 | 3:54am ET
Harbinger Capital Partners’ proposed wireless Internet venture when on the offensive yesterday in the wake of a devastating report on government tests.
LightSquared said yesterday that it would delay one planned power increases for its receivers and abandon another entirely as it seeks to mitigate interference with global positioning systems. The move comes days after the results of recent government tests were leaking, showing that LightSquared’s system interfered with 75% of tested GPS devices.
LightSquared took issue with those results, arguing that a proper analysis of the tests indicates that only 15% of GPS devices suffered interference, and even those were “completely operable with no impact on the user’s experience.” The company is also demanding an investigation into the leak.
LightSquared said its new power-increase plans demonstrate “that an engineering solution to the interference issues with GPS devices is possible.”
The company’s opponents remain unconvinced. “LightSquared insists on using its own self-serving definition of what constitutes harmful interference,” Dale Leibach of the Coalition to Save Our GPS said.
Sep 22 2014 | 4:15pm ET
"I tell people that everybody likes good news and so if you have good performance that’s wonderful,” explains Mike McKitish of Peddie School's endowment, “but it’s the people that want to talk about the bad news or where they drifted and how they came back and how they stayed to their discipline…” that he wants to hear from. Read more…
Sep 30 2014 | 9:29am ET
The crisp Autumnal days of October are upon us, and so are a few of the hedge fund industry’s favorite charitable events. If you have never been to Rocktoberfest, well, you are missing out. And for a quieter evening of sipping and socializing, stop by HFC’s Wine Soiree. Read more…
Most traders agree that proper risk management is the key to successful trading. However, many traders depend on the deeply flawed measure of standard deviation as a benchmark of risk. Here we put it ...