Sunday, 14 September 2014
Last updated 2 days ago
Feb 9 2012 | 3:55am ET
John Paulson yesterday launched a blistering attack on one of the country's largest insurers, calling on it to "do something drastic."
During a conference call for analysts and investors, Hartford Financial Services Group CEO Liam McGee said the firm was looking into splitting its life insurance and property-casualty businesses, but warned that such a move would present "significant challenges."
Those planned did not at all appease Paulson, whose Paulson & Co. is the Hartford's largest shareholder with an 8.7% stake and who just suffered the worst year, performance-wise, of his career.
"Hartford needs to do something drastic because the stock is the lowest valuation relative to book value of any major insurance company," Paulson said. "What I'd like to see you do is not merely come back and say, 'Yes, we're looking at strategic options but there's challenges.' How long do we have to wait to hear if there's going to be a positive recommendation to separate these two businesses?"
"What we need you to do is overcome the obstacles… not merely to point out that there's obstacles," Paulson continued. "You need a better explanation of what you're going to do to enhance shareholder value."
McGee told Paulson that he and his team share the hedge fund honcho's "sense of urgency about realizing greater value for shareholders." He added that he did not say that the obstacles to a split "were not surmountable," only that "we do not believe that splitting them in the current environment… will create shareholder value."
Aug 25 2014 | 11:21am ET
As many of you know, FINalternatives was recently acquired by the owners of Futures magazine, a firm called The Alpha Pages LLC. Today marks the soft-launch of a new sister site for both publications. As its name suggests, The Alpha Pages will cover all types of alternative investments, going far beyond the more well-known ones such as hedge funds and private equity. Read more…
The Federal Reserve keeps baby-stepping toward a “normalization” of monetary policy. But just what is normal?