Bulldog Loses Mutual-Fund Lawsuit Appeal

Oct 2 2012 | 1:10pm ET

Activist hedge fund Bulldog Investors has run into a string of bad luck in the courts.

The New Jersey firm recently lost a bid to have the U.S. Supreme Court hear its appeal of a fine levied by Massachusetts that it said violated its First Amendment free-speech rights. Now, a federal appeals court has rejected its appeal in a case involving allegedly improper mutual-fund trading.

Bulldog lost a lawsuit filed by an investor in Invesco's High Yield Investment Fund last year which accused the hedge fund of improper "short-swing" trades in the closed-end fund after its stake in the fund topped 10%. Now, the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York has upheld that verdict, which resulted in an order for Bulldog to disgorge $85,000 in profits.

"We conclude that short-swing trading in an issuer's stock by a 10% beneficial owner in violation of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act causes injury to the issuer sufficient for constitutional standing," the court wrote.

Bulldog's lawyer said it would appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

The hedge fund had argued that the investor who filed the lawsuit had no standing because Bulldog's trading did not actually harm the mutual fund.


In Depth

Debunking Conventional Investment Wisdom

Feb 8 2017 | 3:22pm ET

Due diligence in the hedge fund world has long involved some combination of the...

Lifestyle

'Tis the Season: Wall Street Holiday Parties Back In Fashion

Dec 22 2016 | 9:23pm ET

Spending on Wall Street holiday parties has largely returned to pre-2008 levels...

Guest Contributor

The Future of Private Equity: New Opportunities, New Challenges

Feb 3 2017 | 6:41pm ET

The private equity industry’s astonishing rebound since the financial crisis has...

 

From the current issue of