Judges Side With Highland Against RBS, Junk £19M Judgment

Apr 15 2013 | 10:18am ET

A British court has thrown out a £19 million judgment against Highland Capital Management in the hedge fund's battle with the Royal Bank of Scotland Group.

The London appeals court found that RBS had won the money "by the fraud of RBS through the misstatement and concealment of facts." The three-judge panel also rejected RBS' bid to block Highland's fraud lawsuit against the bank, filed in Texas.

A British judge in 2010 awarded RBS the money to cover the value of loans in a collapsed collateralized debt obligation. But last year the same judge rejected an earlier RBS bid for an injunction against the Texas lawsuit, accusing the bank of "deception" and accepting Highland's argument that the CDO auction had been a "sham."

Highland has alleged that RBS improperly terminated the CDO and seized the assets in 2008, alleging that RBS trader Sam Griffiths had defrauded it. The appeals court concurred, ruling that Griffiths, who has since been fired by RBS, "had lied."

"This judgment validates Highland's position that no financial institution, regardless of size, it above the law," Highland said.


In Depth

Q&A: Sancus Capital And The Disruption Of The CLO Market

Oct 5 2017 | 6:28pm ET

Traditional collateralized loan obligation (CLO) funds in the U.S. market can offer...

Lifestyle

CFA Institute To Add Computer Science To Exam Curriculum

May 24 2017 | 9:25pm ET

Starting in 2019, financial industry executives sitting for the coveted Chartered...

Guest Contributor

Finding Success as Alternatives Converge

Oct 9 2017 | 4:00pm ET

Rising interest among institutional investors over the past several years has led...