Petters-Linked Hedge Fund Manager Goes On Trial

May 21 2013 | 1:02pm ET

The opposing lawyers in the fraud trial of hedge fund manager James Fry agree on one thing: Ponzi scheme mastermind Thomas Petters is not a good guy.

The trial of Fry, the founder of Arrowhead Capital Management, opened this week, some two years after he was first charged with aiding and abetting Petters' fraud by lying to investors about him and his chief fundraiser. And prosecutors did not hesitate to admit that Petters was less-than-fully-forthcoming with Fry—but that the fact does not exonerate Fry.

"Tom Petters lied to Jim Fry and Fry turned around a lied to his investors," prosecutor Timothy Rank told the St. Paul, Minn., federal jury. According to the government, Fry lied to investors about Petters' default on notes owned by Arrowhead and failed to tell clients about fundraiser Frank Vennes' criminal record. Vennes unexpectedly pleaded guilty in the case in February, delaying Fry's trial.

"Fry got his money for lying," Rank said.

Fry's lawyer, Joe Friedberg, denied that his client knowingly lied to investors, telling the jury that he was "under ether provided by Tom Petters," whom he called the author of the "Pulitzer Prize of Ponzi schemes."

Fry faces 12 counts of securities fraud, wire fraud and making false statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

And while the lawyers in the Fry case argue over the impact of Petters' lies, Petters himself has said that he's been lied to—by his former lawyer.

Petters claims that Jon Hopeman never told him that prosecutors offered a 30-year sentence in exchange for a guilty plea. Instead, Petters went to trial and was found guilty—and sentenced to 50 years in prison.

"But for Mr. Hopeman's ineffective assistance, defendant Petters would have received a far shorter sentence than currently imposed," Petters' new lawyer, Steven Meshbesher, said.

Meshbesher asked the court to allow Petters to plead guilty in line with prosecutors' 30-year offer.

Petters' run through the appeals process has been anything but a success so far: The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals twice rejected his bid for a new trial, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear his appeal.


In Depth

Exotic Assets: Investing In Rare Violins

Jan 17 2017 | 4:43pm ET

By definition, alternative investments include exotic assets far beyond your typical...

Lifestyle

'Tis the Season: Wall Street Holiday Parties Back In Fashion

Dec 22 2016 | 9:23pm ET

Spending on Wall Street holiday parties has largely returned to pre-2008 levels...

Guest Contributor

The Trump Administration: What It Could Mean for Carried Interest

Jan 19 2017 | 5:25pm ET

The arrival of the Trump administration brings the potential for a repeal of the...

 

From the current issue of

Often seen as a passion project, or part of a philanthropic venture, rare and fine stringed instruments offer an exciting option to diversify one’s investment portfolio while providing an opportunity for an exceptional long-term investment.