Supreme Court Backs Hedge Funds In Price-Fixing Case

May 29 2013 | 11:19am ET

The U.S. Supreme Court handed a victory to a large group of hedge funds yesterday, letting stand a lower-court decision that cleared them of antitrust violations.

The high court refused the appeal of Atlanticus Holdings, the former CompuCredit Holdings, which alleged that 21 hedge funds violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by conspiring to force it to redeem long-dated convertible promissory notes decades ahead of schedule. The court's decision—and a rejection of Atlanticus' bid for a deferral of consideration—leaves in place the U.S. District Court decision, which found that the hedge funds, including GLG Partners and Akanthos Capital Management, were acting as creditors and were therefore exempt from antitrust laws.

The Supreme Court did not explain its decision.

Atlanticus in 2011 sued the hedge funds, alleging that they had acquired about 70% of the notes as part of a conspiracy to fix prices. The hedge fund refused to participate in a 2010 repurchase offer, and several months later demanded that Atlanticus repurchase the notes at face value—twice the price available on the secondary market.

Harry Niska, a lawyer for the hedge funds, said that the court "correctly held that the existing market practice of a debtor jointly renegotiating its existing debt with multiple creditors does not violate the antitrust laws."


In Depth

Steinbrugge: Will Hedge Funds Help or Hurt During the Next Market Correction?

Sep 7 2016 | 11:55pm ET

Most investors have become accustomed to quick rebounds when markets correct, but...

Lifestyle

Quattrex Sports AG Debuts Soccer-Focused UCITS Fund

Sep 9 2016 | 9:54pm ET

Innovative alternative investment company Quattrex Sports has unveiled a new UCITS...

Guest Contributor

Malik: The Ever-Changing Middle Market and The Entering Class of 2016

Sep 2 2016 | 5:01pm ET

Deal sourcing and origination is only going to get more competitive given current...