Steinberg Lawyers Make Issue Of Press Coverage

Jul 10 2013 | 12:32pm ET

Lawyers for SAC Capital Advisors' Michael Steinberg, accused of insider-trading, are afraid that the "ubiquitous" and "inflammatory" coverage of the case could prevent their client from getting a fair trial.

Barry Berke asked a judge to ask potential jurors about their exposure to the publicity surrounding the case in a juror questionnaire, as well as other measures to avoid a tainted jury, including permission to question potential jurors who are familiar with the case.

"The coverage has not only been ubiquitous, but its qualitative content has also been inflammatory, thereby heightening the risk that it could interfere with the ability of potential jurors to assess impartially the government's case against Mr. Steinberg and Mr. Steinberg's defense," Berke wrote.

The lawyer sought to quantify just how "saturated" the media has been: The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and New York Post have run at least 181 articles about Steinberg or SAC since September, including 15 front-page stories. The case has also been actively discussed on Twitter, with 531 Tweets about Steinberg or SAC, which were re-Tweeted 3,454 times.

Steinberg's trial is set to begin on Nov. 18. He is accused of trading technology shares based on confidential information passed to him by a former analyst.


In Depth

Steinbrugge: Top 10 Hedge Fund Industry Trends for 2017

Jan 3 2017 | 9:03pm ET

Each year, Agecroft Partners' Don Steinbrugge predicts the top hedge fund industry...

Lifestyle

'Tis the Season: Wall Street Holiday Parties Back In Fashion

Dec 22 2016 | 9:23pm ET

Spending on Wall Street holiday parties has largely returned to pre-2008 levels...

Guest Contributor

DarcMatter: The Top Trends in Alternative Investments for 2017

Jan 13 2017 | 8:22pm ET

The $7 trillion alternative investments industry is poised for continued growth...

 

From the current issue of

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ordered The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Goldman, Sachs & Co. to pay a $120 million penalty for attempted manipulation and false reporting of ISDAFIX Benchmark Rates, a global benchmark for interest rate products.