Delaware’s Top Judge Wants Limits On Activism, Tougher Disclosure For Hedge Funds

Mar 27 2014 | 11:54am ET

The newly-installed chief justice of the Delaware Supreme Court has certainly seen his share of activist investors, during his 16 years on the state’s Court of Chancery, one of the most important corporate courts in the country. And he’d like to see fewer of them.

In an article in the most recent Columbia Law Review, Leo Strine argues for more limits on corporate governance votes, writing that the recent “deluge” threatens to “turn the corporate governance process into a constant ‘Model United Nations’ where managers are repeatedly distracted by referenda on a variety of topics proposed by investors with trifling stakes.”

According to Strine, the stakes for the companies are not so trifling: In addition to the distraction to management, companies are forced to pay handsomely to defend themselves, he said. And the number of votes makes it impossible for institutional investors to give due consideration to all of them.

To remedy the situation, Stine argues that investors should have to pay to submit proposals at a company’s annual meeting. In addition, certain votes, such as on pay, should be limited to once every three or four years.

Strine also wants to make activist hedge funds disclose more about their positions more quickly.


In Depth

Exotic Assets: Investing In Rare Violins

Jan 17 2017 | 4:43pm ET

By definition, alternative investments include exotic assets far beyond your typical...

Lifestyle

'Tis the Season: Wall Street Holiday Parties Back In Fashion

Dec 22 2016 | 9:23pm ET

Spending on Wall Street holiday parties has largely returned to pre-2008 levels...

Guest Contributor

DarcMatter: The Top Trends in Alternative Investments for 2017

Jan 13 2017 | 8:22pm ET

The $7 trillion alternative investments industry is poised for continued growth...

 

From the current issue of

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ordered The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Goldman, Sachs & Co. to pay a $120 million penalty for attempted manipulation and false reporting of ISDAFIX Benchmark Rates, a global benchmark for interest rate products.