Delaware’s Top Judge Wants Limits On Activism, Tougher Disclosure For Hedge Funds

Mar 27 2014 | 11:54am ET

The newly-installed chief justice of the Delaware Supreme Court has certainly seen his share of activist investors, during his 16 years on the state’s Court of Chancery, one of the most important corporate courts in the country. And he’d like to see fewer of them.

In an article in the most recent Columbia Law Review, Leo Strine argues for more limits on corporate governance votes, writing that the recent “deluge” threatens to “turn the corporate governance process into a constant ‘Model United Nations’ where managers are repeatedly distracted by referenda on a variety of topics proposed by investors with trifling stakes.”

According to Strine, the stakes for the companies are not so trifling: In addition to the distraction to management, companies are forced to pay handsomely to defend themselves, he said. And the number of votes makes it impossible for institutional investors to give due consideration to all of them.

To remedy the situation, Stine argues that investors should have to pay to submit proposals at a company’s annual meeting. In addition, certain votes, such as on pay, should be limited to once every three or four years.

Strine also wants to make activist hedge funds disclose more about their positions more quickly.


In Depth

MiFID2 For U.S. Firms: Key Questions Answered

Feb 27 2017 | 4:54pm ET

The January 2018 deadline for implementation of the EU’s mammoth MiFID2 regulations...

Lifestyle

'Tis the Season: Wall Street Holiday Parties Back In Fashion

Dec 22 2016 | 9:23pm ET

Spending on Wall Street holiday parties has largely returned to pre-2008 levels...

Guest Contributor

iCapital Network: The Trump Effect On Direct Lending

Feb 23 2017 | 4:21pm ET

The arrival of the Trump Administration has raised questions among private debt...

 

From the current issue of