ISS, Glass Lewis Split On Third Point Sotheby’s Nominees

Apr 25 2014 | 1:41pm ET

With just over a week to go before votes are due in his proxy contest with Sotheby’s, Third Point’s Daniel Loeb got some mixed endorsement news.

Institutional Shareholder Services, arguably the most influential proxy adviser, urged the auction house’s shareholders to vote for the Third Point founder and one of its other nominees, jewelry magnate Olivier Reza. But ISS withheld its endorsement from Third Point’s third nominee, Harry Wilson.

Another proxy advisory, Glass Lewis & Co., agreed that shareholders shouldn’t put Wilson on the board. But it doesn’t want to see Loeb or Reza elected, either.

Glass Lewis said that Loeb had “identified certain areas of concern, but ultimately has fallen short of making a compelling case that additional changes in the boardroom are warranted at this time.”

ISS disagreed. “It is difficult to believe this is a board keenly attentive to all the opportunities at hand to enhance shareholder value,” the firm wrote, echoing, albeit diplomatically, Loeb’s attacks on what he calls an entrenched board responsible for Sotheby’s “chronically weak operating margins.”

Sotheby’s annual meeting is on May 6. The company reiterated yesterday that Loeb and his fellow nominees would add no “relevant expertise” to the board.

Third Point owns 9.6% of Sotheby’s, and is backed by fellow hedge fund Marcato Capital Management, which owns a 6.6% stake.


In Depth

Steinbrugge: Top 10 Hedge Fund Industry Trends for 2017

Jan 3 2017 | 9:03pm ET

Each year, Agecroft Partners' Don Steinbrugge predicts the top hedge fund industry...

Lifestyle

'Tis the Season: Wall Street Holiday Parties Back In Fashion

Dec 22 2016 | 9:23pm ET

Spending on Wall Street holiday parties has largely returned to pre-2008 levels...

Guest Contributor

DarcMatter: The Top Trends in Alternative Investments for 2017

Jan 13 2017 | 8:22pm ET

The $7 trillion alternative investments industry is poised for continued growth...

 

From the current issue of

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ordered The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Goldman, Sachs & Co. to pay a $120 million penalty for attempted manipulation and false reporting of ISDAFIX Benchmark Rates, a global benchmark for interest rate products.