Thursday, 27 November 2014
Last updated 1 day ago
May 19 2014 | 4:15pm ET
Hedge fund may avoid the dreaded designation "systemically important," after all.
A U.S. Treasury official said today that there has been "a bit of an overreaction" on the part of the asset management industry to the prospect of such a designation, which would place a firm under Federal Reserve oversight. Mary Miller told Bloomberg Television that it is "certainly an option" that no asset management firm will be found systemically important.
"We have to determine are there risks, and if there is a determination that there are risks, then you have to think about what are the remedies," she said. "Is it presented by an individual firm, by the industry as a whole, or perhaps by certain activities that asset managers engage in."
Power to designate firms lies with the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which held a public conference today featuring Citadel Investment Group's Kenneth Griffin. Miller said she hopes that the confab will "clear up a little bit of that misunderstanding."
Despite industry fears, "there is no pre-determined outcome," Miller insisted. "No judgments have been made."
Nov 4 2014 | 9:45am ET
Data management is important to every business, but for hedge funds, it is critical. FINalternatives recently asked Peter Sanchez, CEO of Northern Trust Hedge Fund Services, how fund managers can deal with the demands of managing data while at the same time remain transparent and abide by operational best practices. Read more…
Reg NMS created a huge bifurcation in equity markets and while much of what has followed has been positive, in terms of lower fees and greater liquidity, many traders would like to see the market come...