AQR Denies Shelving IPO

Nov 12 2007 | 3:45pm ET

One week after it reportedly shelved plans for an initial public offering because of losses stemming from poor performance, AQR Capital Management is doing some serious damage control through its public relations firm.

Brian Maddox, a spokesman for the firm, vehemently denies a New York Post report that the firm withdrew its plans for an IPO due to investors withdrawing their capital in light of poor performance.

“AQR did not ‘shelve’ the IPO process - it hadn't even filed a registration statement with the SEC,” Maddox told FINalternatives.

According to Maddox, AQR has also not experienced large redemptions from investors. Rather, he says the firm’s assets under management have risen from $29 billion at the beginning of the year to their current level of $38.5 billion. As well, Maddox says the firm is “doing reasonably well in a volatile market” with some of its hedge funds up in the double digits, while a few are down but only in the single digits – “though one hedge fund, which represents less than 1% of our AUM, is for the moment down in the double digits.” He declined to disclose the specific hedge fund.

For now, Maddox said market turmoil does not favor the IPO of any firm in AQR's industry, although he declined to further comment on the firm’s future IPO plans. However, Reuters reports today that, “AQR is leaving open the possibility that it may revive IPO plans in coming months, according to people familiar with its plans."


In Depth

AIMA: Smaller Firms Remain the Lifeblood of the Hedge Fund Industry

Jul 26 2017 | 5:55pm ET

It is a hedge fund industry truism that the largest managers receive the most attention...

Lifestyle

CFA Institute To Add Computer Science To Exam Curriculum

May 24 2017 | 9:25pm ET

Starting in 2019, financial industry executives sitting for the coveted Chartered...

Guest Contributor

Rastegar: PE Real Estate Gains Momentum as Uncertainty Rises

Jul 21 2017 | 6:04pm ET

The steady march of equity markets and fundamental shift in the direction of Fed...

 

From the current issue of