MPI: Like Stellar Returns? Better Understand the Risks First

Jul 22 2016 | 8:44pm ET

Editor’s note: When the press reports extraordinarily strong relative or risk-adjusted returns at a particular fund, useful insights can be gathered by exploring how such a result could be hypothetically recreated using a combination of indexes, writes Michael Markov, chairman of Markov Processes International in this contributed article.

Like Stellar Returns? Better Understand the Risks First

By Michael Markov

A recent article in The Wall Street Journal featured Quantedge Capital, a quantitative global macro hedge fund manager that has gained around 40% after fees year-to-date through June. The fund’s 2016 performance is outstanding indeed, especially when compared with major asset classes in the chart below (here and below we use the fund’s performance data from Eurekahedge):

According to the investor letter cited in the article, the fund’s extraordinary returns were attributed to leveraged bets on fixed income securities. Such performance obviously comes with a cost – the article mentions 30% target annual volatility (standard deviation). Based on our analysis of the fund’s trailing 36 months of monthly returns, the volatility is in this range and is higher than any of the traditional asset classes – even emerging markets and commodities – as shown in chart below.
 

Now we will attempt to create a hypothetical portfolio of the major asset classes that would have delivered similar returns to Quantedge Global with a similar risk in 2016. Obviously, there are infinite ways one could explain a 40% six-month return by leveraging any of the asset classes above.  However, if we also require that such a hypothetical portfolio mimics the fund’s return month-to-month over the past, say, 36 months – this becomes an infinitely more complex task.  We used our proprietary Dynamic Style Analysis (DSA) to perform this analysis, the results of which are shown below.  

Note that the resulting asset class exposures do not represent the actual positions that were held by the fund, but rather the combination of indexes that best mimic its returns. For an investor curious how such performance could have been achieved, it provides some useful insights.   

The chart below shows the product of the DSA analysis – a hypothetical portfolio of indexes that accurately captures the performance swings of the year-to-date period as well as the past 36 months.

In the chart above, we show the fund’s asset class exposure changes over time: the long exposures are shown above 0 and the short exposures are shown below.  We selected the market indices to represent four major asset classes that a typical global macro fund trades in, plus emerging market equity.

The hypothetical portfolio demonstrates relatively stable historical exposures.  It does show a gradual decrease in developed equity exposure and an increase in fixed income over time. As an investment portfolio, the short position of T-Bills represents leverage, as cash is borrowed to increase asset exposures above 100%. Here, the hypothetical portfolio’s leverage gradually declines from about 370% to 290% over time. 

The above chart shows the performance of the hypothetical portfolio vs. the actual fund. Given this good level of tracking, one could view this hypothetical strategy as a plausible way that the fund’s results could have been achieved. 

We also did a quantitative performance attribution analysis for the year to date period, shown in the chart below, to see how each asset class exposure contributed to the overall return of the hypothetical portfolio.  One can see that gains from fixed income exposure dominated the YTD performance – similar to what was mentioned in the WSJ article.

For investors curious about how one achieves stellar returns year-to-date, the answer is, “Yes, it’s doable.” However, it is critical to understand how a given product is achieving its extreme returns and carefully identifying the potential risks associated with its strategy.

Only through this kind of analysis can an investor understand how such a product can fit into a portfolio with other investments to achieve the overall desired properties. Additionally, in the process of doing such an analysis, investors may find that the returns of a given strategy can be mimicked quite well by a combination of common factors. In such cases, investors will be better armed to make informed allocation decisions. 

Markov Processes International (MPI) is a provider of investment research, analytics and technology. Its solutions are used by alternative research groups, hedge funds, hedge fund of funds, family offices, institutional investors, consultants, private banks, asset managers, investment advisors and private wealth professionals.   

Disclaimer: MPI conducts returns-based analyses and, beyond any public information, does not claim to know or imply what the actual strategy, positions or holdings of the funds discussed are, nor are we commenting on the quality or merits of the actual investment strategies. This analysis is purely returns-based and does not reflect insights into actual holdings.


In Depth

Q&A: Portfolio Advisors' Brian Murphy On The Advantages of A Private Markets Platform

Jan 2 2018 | 11:05am ET

Most private markets firms reference their platforms as a source of competitive...

Lifestyle

CFA Institute To Add Computer Science To Exam Curriculum

May 24 2017 | 9:25pm ET

Starting in 2019, financial industry executives sitting for the coveted Chartered...

Guest Contributor

Steinbrugge: The Top Hedge Fund Industry Trends for 2018

Jan 2 2018 | 12:22pm ET

Each year, Don Steinbrugge’s Agecroft Partners compiles the insights gained...