Credit Suisse Index Socked By Madoff-Hit Funds

Dec 16 2008 | 3:56am ET

Losses taken by two hedge funds that invested with accused Ponzi schemer Bernard Madoff have translated into big losses for a hedge fund index.

The Credit Suisse Index Co. yesterday updated its November numbers in light of the Madoff scandal, which could total as much as $50 billion. The company wrote down the values of the Fairfield Sentry and Kingate Global hedge funds, which had $7.5 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, invested with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities.

The Credit Suisse/Tremont Hedge Fund Index actually lost 4.15% last month, rather than the 0.71% estimated loss reported last week. The write-downs pushed the index’s year-to-date loss down to 19.04% from 16.14%.

“The unexpected events around Kingate Global/Fairfield Sentry have had material effects on the performance of the Equity Market Neutral sector, and therefore have also impacted the broad benchmark index,” CS Index Co. President Oliver Schupp said. “Considering the information we now have concerning Kingate Global/Fairfield Sentry, assets under management for the funds have been marked down to zero for November to reflect the news received last week.”

Indeed, the losses at Kingate and Fairfield Greenwich turned CS’ equity-market neutral subindex from one of last month’s best performers into its worst. The benchmark is now estimated to have lost 40.45% in November (last week’s estimate had it up 0.85%), and 40.56% year-to-date.


In Depth

GSAM's Papagiannis: Liquid Alternatives For The Long Run

Apr 21 2017 | 8:44pm ET

Interest in liquid alternatives cooled a bit last year amid a broad shift in investor...

Lifestyle

Aston Martin Returns To Debt Market As DB11 Drives Turnaround

Mar 31 2017 | 5:21pm ET

James Bond’s preferred carmaker is returning to the public debt markets for the...

Guest Contributor

Debunking Conventional Investment Wisdom (Part II)

Apr 17 2017 | 5:56pm ET

The alternative investment industry is currently replete with buzzwords around data...

 

From the current issue of