Thursday, 23 October 2014
Last updated 3 hours ago
Jul 10 2009 | 9:26am ET
Hedge fund consultancy the Hennessee Group announced today that the Hennessee Hedge Fund Index gained +11.74% during the first six months of 2009, the strongest gain for the benchmark since 1999 when the index rose +14.81%. Over the same six month time period, the S&P 500 Index is up +1.78%, resulting in nearly +10% in outperformance for the Hennessee Hedge Fund Index.
“The last time we saw a double digit gain for hedge funds in the first six months of the year was in the midst of a strong bull market when the S&P was also experiencing double digit gains,” said Charles Gradante, co-founder of Hennessee Group.
“Conversely, this year, the S&P has been extremely volatile and has advanced a little less than +2% since January. Hedge fund managers have demonstrated an ability to generate alpha, via strong stock selection on both long and short side of their portfolios while taking on little directional exposure.”
“2008 was the worst year for hedge funds in terms of performance since Hennessee Group began tracking performance and assets in 1987,” said Lee Hennessee, managing principal of the firm. “This year’s performance, on the heels of such a difficult year, illustrates the resiliency of the hedge fund industry and is likely to lead to renewed interest and growth for the hedge fund industry as the year progresses.”
|First Six Months of Year||Full Year|
|Year||Hennessee Hedge Fund Index||S&P 500||Hennessee Hedge Fund Index||S&P 500|
Sep 22 2014 | 4:15pm ET
"I tell people that everybody likes good news and so if you have good performance that’s wonderful,” explains Mike McKitish of Peddie School's endowment, “but it’s the people that want to talk about the bad news or where they drifted and how they came back and how they stayed to their discipline…” that he wants to hear from. Read more…
Most traders agree that proper risk management is the key to successful trading. However, many traders depend on the deeply flawed measure of standard deviation as a benchmark of risk. Here we put it ...