Sunday, 26 June 2016
Last updated 2 days ago
Aug 14 2009 | 11:33am ET
Sometimes, constitutional rights can be a double-edged sword. Just ask hedge fund manager and accused Ponzi schemer R. Allen Stanford.
Just like his fellow accused hedge fund fraudster Arthur Nadel, Stanford is having troubled holding onto lawyers because he can’t pay them, thanks to an asset freeze imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. His current lawyer wants out, and his proposed new lawyer refuses to sign on unless he can guarantee payment.
Stanford’s current lawyer, Dick DeGuerin, says his client has no money available to pay for legal representation, which is constitutionally guaranteed. And the only way he can get that money is to give up another constitutional right, that against self-incrimination.
Stanford denies running a $7 billion Ponzi scheme. But he needs to show that the frozen assets are untainted to get them unfrozen, and anything he says in doing so could be used against him by prosecutors.
“The U.S. government and parties acting under its authority have coordinated an attack on Mr. Stanford’s constitutional rights,” DeGuerin, who’s stuck with the case until Stanford can find another lawyer, wrote in a filing last month.
Tant pis, says the U.S. attorney’s office.
“Given the clear lack of any constitutional violations, there is no basis for the relief Stanford seeks,” they responded.